GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Mar 16, 2018 | Blogs, Software, Technology | 0 comments
Make the Most out of Your People and InstrumentationUnless you’re running samples, you’re losing revenue. Even if you’re not charging your customers for sample runs, your operating costs rise like a rocket when your instruments are down. Therefore, instrument downtime is a significant concern for most labs.
After polling SCIEX users, we found that labs that used the SCIEX remote monitoring service found that up to 50 percent of their instrument issues could be resolved remotely.
These users spent much less time waiting for a service engineer to arrive on site, diagnose and repair the problem.
SCIEX LC-MS systems already have exceptional uptime, but reclaiming a day of productivity means your instruments are running samples that would otherwise be waiting.
Based on a number of samples run per day and cost or revenue per sample, even a 1% increase in uptime could save you thousands of dollars!
Mass Spec Remote Monitoring Services Enable Your Lab to:
How often have you had to postpone operations while waiting for a service call?Perhaps you are familiar with the advantages of remote monitoring services but have difficulty convincing your management of their value.
Remember, remote monitoring services simply cannot be beaten when it comes to obtaining reports on instrument utilization, performance, uptime, and sample throughput.
With remote monitoring, your team can monitor the current health your system efficiently. That means you are already in the know when things are amiss.
When an instrument requires an onsite fix, an engineer spends less time diagnosing the problem and more time actually fixing the problem, which can save your lab hours or days of downtime.
Clearly, remote monitoring enhances your organization’s competitive advantage. Better productivity, better efficiency, and most of all lower costs and higher revenue
Want to leverage tools that help you win? Check out StatusScope® Remote Monitoring. Start benefitting from useful reports on throughput, productivity and asset utilization on all your SCIEX mass spectrometers, everywhere.
Developing an analytical method can be one of the most rewarding jobs an analytical scientist can do, but it can also be one of the most complex and frustrating. To help guide your practical experiments and thought processes we spoke to Kean Woodmansey to benefit from his experience.
As analytical organizations grow, there is an even greater need to train scientists and operators more consistently to meet tight deadlines, handle increasing samples, and meet data quality expectations. A high rate of employee turnover also affects the productivity of labs worldwide. Consistent training helps today’s labs stay competitive, whether the goal is sample throughput, therapeutic development, or publication.
A few years ago, I was plotting along in my analytical job and keeping up-to-date with residue regulations took a considerable amount of time, but it was always manageable. Nowadays, we have PFAS.
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network