GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Mar 16, 2018 | Blogs, Software, Technology | 0 comments
Make the Most out of Your People and InstrumentationUnless you’re running samples, you’re losing revenue. Even if you’re not charging your customers for sample runs, your operating costs rise like a rocket when your instruments are down. Therefore, instrument downtime is a significant concern for most labs.
After polling SCIEX users, we found that labs that used the SCIEX remote monitoring service found that up to 50 percent of their instrument issues could be resolved remotely.
These users spent much less time waiting for a service engineer to arrive on site, diagnose and repair the problem.
SCIEX LC-MS systems already have exceptional uptime, but reclaiming a day of productivity means your instruments are running samples that would otherwise be waiting.
Based on a number of samples run per day and cost or revenue per sample, even a 1% increase in uptime could save you thousands of dollars!
Mass Spec Remote Monitoring Services Enable Your Lab to:
How often have you had to postpone operations while waiting for a service call?Perhaps you are familiar with the advantages of remote monitoring services but have difficulty convincing your management of their value.
Remember, remote monitoring services simply cannot be beaten when it comes to obtaining reports on instrument utilization, performance, uptime, and sample throughput.
With remote monitoring, your team can monitor the current health your system efficiently. That means you are already in the know when things are amiss.
When an instrument requires an onsite fix, an engineer spends less time diagnosing the problem and more time actually fixing the problem, which can save your lab hours or days of downtime.
Clearly, remote monitoring enhances your organization’s competitive advantage. Better productivity, better efficiency, and most of all lower costs and higher revenue
Want to leverage tools that help you win? Check out StatusScope® Remote Monitoring. Start benefitting from useful reports on throughput, productivity and asset utilization on all your SCIEX mass spectrometers, everywhere.
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is emerging as one of the most concerning ultrashort-chain PFAS in Europe’s food supply – particularly in cereals, a staple consumed daily by millions. A report from PAN Europe reveals a widespread and largely unmonitored contamination trend that raises serious questions about food safety, regulatory blind spots, and future monitoring strategies.
PFAS analysis is complex, but expert guidance doesn’t have to be. In this episode of our ‘Ask the PFAS expert series’, we’re joined by Michael Scherer, Application Lead for Food and Environmental, to answer the most pressing questions in PFAS analysis. From why LC-MS/MS systems are the gold standard for analyzing diverse PFAS compounds, to which EU methods deliver reliable results for drinking water, and to practical steps to prevent contamination, Michael shares actionable insights to help laboratories achieve accuracy, consistency, and confidence in their workflows.
During an LC-MS/MS experiment, traditional fragmentation techniques like collision-induced dissociation (CID) have long been the gold standard. Electron-activated dissociation (EAD) is emerging as a transformative tool that enhances structural elucidation, particularly for complex or labile metabolites.
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network