GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Jan 29, 2023 | Biopharma, Blogs, Echo® MS+ system, Pharma | 1 comment
You asked, we answered! With analysis speeds of at least 1 sample per second, the Echo® MS system has created a buzz in the industry. This is up to 50x faster than conventional LC-MS/MS. This revolutionary tool for drug discovery and development has led to many questions from scientists and researchers around the world. We answer the top 7 Echo® MS system questions here.
The sample ejection volume for the Echo® MS system is about 0.1% of what you are injecting into an LC-MS system. Therefore, you are putting many fewer contaminants into the system over the same period of time.
The SCIEX OS software controls the system. This allows us to automatically process the data and export the results to any visualization software or LIMS. The SCIEX OS API (Application Programming Interface) allows integration with automation software from robotics vendors.
What types of liquid handling systems can be interfaced upstream of the Echo MS system? And what plate/sample throughput rates are possible?
The system is compatible with any vendor’s robotics system that can manage 384- and 1536-well plates. The cycle time for 384-well plates is less than 10 minutes, and for 1536-well plates it is less than 30 minutes.
The total size of the system is approximately 1.3 meters x 1.4 meters. This does not include the acquisition computer (which can be located up to 2 meters from the system) or the 1 meter of service access required around the entire system.
For a 384-well plate, the minimum volume required in the well is 20 µL and for 1536-well plates the minimum volume required is 3 µL. This is to ensure efficient ejection of the sample droplet.
Do you have a question? Please submit your question today or add it below in the comments.
Learn more about what the Echo® MS system can do for your lab at sciex.com/echoms. You will be able to see inside the system, download the brochure, gain access to technical notes, watch the video and request a quote.
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is emerging as one of the most concerning ultrashort-chain PFAS in Europe’s food supply – particularly in cereals, a staple consumed daily by millions. A report from PAN Europe reveals a widespread and largely unmonitored contamination trend that raises serious questions about food safety, regulatory blind spots, and future monitoring strategies.
PFAS analysis is complex, but expert guidance doesn’t have to be. In this episode of our ‘Ask the PFAS expert series’, we’re joined by Michael Scherer, Application Lead for Food and Environmental, to answer the most pressing questions in PFAS analysis. From why LC-MS/MS systems are the gold standard for analyzing diverse PFAS compounds, to which EU methods deliver reliable results for drinking water, and to practical steps to prevent contamination, Michael shares actionable insights to help laboratories achieve accuracy, consistency, and confidence in their workflows.
During an LC-MS/MS experiment, traditional fragmentation techniques like collision-induced dissociation (CID) have long been the gold standard. Electron-activated dissociation (EAD) is emerging as a transformative tool that enhances structural elucidation, particularly for complex or labile metabolites.
Posted by
nice
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network