GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
May 8, 2020 | Blogs, Development, Pharma, QA/QC | 0 comments
In my previous blog, I spoke about the FDA recall of angiotensin II receptor blockers like losartan. This recall was due to the presence of genotoxic nitrosamines.
Is a proactive approach the way to mitigate risk?
Recently, the FDA has re-issued the 2018 guidance to industry, “M7(R1) assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk”. Is this going to help? Or should we have a higher focus of qualitative analysis up front?
Companies need to take a look all facets of their supply chain and manufacturing process. They should be able to ensure they can control the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) throughout the process, whether they do it in their own facility or it is outsourced.
How are they going to do this?
Why you need a control strategy
A control strategy is a planned set of controls derived from current product and process understanding that assures process performance and product quality (ICH Q10, Ref. 8).
A control strategy can include, but is not limited to, the following:
How to ensuring better data, by seeing it all
Work previously presented by Prof. Sörgel, at the Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research, Nuremberg, Germany on the benefits of this workflow is that with SWATH® Acquisition you are creating a digital record of all the analytes in the sample.
This approach shows:
Watch out for our next blog where we examine some of the analytical challenges of these molecules.You can learn more about how LC-MS/MS solutions can identify, quantify and monitor the required levels of nitrosamine impurities by accessing technical notes and a webinar addressing the characterization and quantification of the genotoxic impurities.
Learn More >
This is part two of an ongoing blog series on genotoxic analysis. Read part one: “What have we learned from the nitrosamine crisis?” and part three: “Developing a method for nitrosamine analysis in pharmaceutical products“.
RUO-MKT-18-11383-A
Regulated laboratories are evolving faster than ever. New analytical modalities, higher sample throughput, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and leaner teams are reshaping how work gets done. At the same time, expectations for data integrity, standardization, and operational efficiency continue to increase complexity and/or scope. In this environment, LC-MS software is no longer simply an instrument control platform—it has become a critical part of a laboratory’s quality management system. The question is no longer whether your lab has changed, but whether your software has evolved to support the way regulated labs operate today, and if they are ready and able to meet the demands, they will face tomorrow.
Analyst software has long been a trusted foundation in regulated LC-MS laboratories—and for many, it still performs reliably today. But regulated environments are evolving faster than ever. As labs transition to Windows 11, strengthen cybersecurity policies, modernize IT infrastructure, and prepare for future compliance expectations, software decisions are no longer just about what works today—they’re about managing tomorrow’s risk. Analyst will not be supported on Windows 11. While some labs may continue operating in unsupported environments temporarily, the bigger question is: when that risk becomes reality, will your lab be reacting under pressure—or executing a planned mitigation strategy with confidence?
As regulatory scrutiny increases and detection requirements tighten, laboratories are facing a new question: How can TFA be measured reliably, sensitively, and at scale?
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network