Developing a method for nitrosamine analysis in pharmaceutical products

Jan 22, 2021 | Blogs, Pharma | 0 comments

Read time: 5 minutes

In our previous blogs we discussed the need for a more comprehensive approach for monitoring contaminants in finished drug products.1,2 Here we cover a generalized approach for the targeted, quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of several commonly encountered nitrosamines in pharmaceuticals and ways to address specific challenges with their analysis.

 

Sample Preparation

While using pure water as an extraction solvent may seem attractive in some cases, many formulations will yield a gel-like slurry that is difficult to work with. Instead, a current approach used by the US FDA is to simply dissolve the drug product or substance in pure methanol and proceed with the analysis.3 Because nitrosamines are semi-volatile compounds, any vacuum or drying steps should be avoided to eliminate losses that could occur from these procedures. And although cleanup and concentration could be accomplished using SPE and centrifugation or positive pressure (as opposed to a vacuum), these steps can be avoided by simply using a more sensitive mass spectrometer.

Chromatography

Nitrosamines should be well separated from the API in order to avoid any suppression effects that can result from co-elution with the highly concentrated API. Additionally, some nitrosamines can be quite hydrophilic, such as NDMA, and elute early in a standard gradient. Separations for a common group of nitrosamines have been developed by scientists in the applications group at Phenomenex on several different column phases.4 To avoid contamination of the instrument, a divert valve is used in-line with the LC so that the API peak can be directed to waste instead of the mass spectrometer.

Mass Spectrometry

When considering the type of ionization for this class of compounds, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) provides good sensitivity and is less prone to matrix-based ionization effects than electrospray ionization (ESI). For detection and quantitation, targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) experiments provide high sensitivity and high specificity. Interferences that are encountered using HRMS methods, such as the 15N isotope of the common solvent DMA co-eluting with NDMA, are simply avoided with MRM methods. All MRM transitions and source conditions for the quantitation of nitrosamines using SCIEX triple quadrupole systems have been carefully optimized and are freely available. Because of the lack of a blank matrix for matrix matching of calibration standards to samples, matrix spikes or standard addition quantitation can be used. This feature is provided in SCIEX OS Software data processing, and can increase confidence in the final result even from standards prepared in pure methanol.

Sensitivity of the Assay

Using the preparation method discussed above, the sample will be in pure methanol. In order to avoid problems with column retention and poor peak shape in reverse phase separations, small injection volumes are recommended (~1uL) and the use of high sensitivity instruments. Currently, the US FDA has specified maximum allowable daily exposure amounts for these compounds,5 for example, 0.096 ug per day for NDMA. Thus, the required lower limit of quantitation will be based on the daily dosage of the pharmaceutical.

As an example, if the daily dosage of a drug is 500 mg per day, the required LLOQ would be:
LLOQ≤0.096ug/0.5g or 0.192 ug/g of NDMA in the API.

Assuming a sample preparation of 100 mg API in 1 ml MeOH, this equates to:
0.192 ug/g* 0.1 g/ml=0.0192 ug/ml in the final extract, or just under 20 ng/ml.

Higher dosage pharmaceuticals will require even lower limits of quantitation to meet regulatory specifications. Additionally, starting in 2021, the FDA will implement lower allowable daily exposure limits. Thus, while a less sensitive instrument may meet current needs, more sensitive assays will be required in the future. SCIEX provides a suite of instruments that easily meet the sensitivity needs for today and for the future. To learn more about SCIEX solutions for the high sensitivity quantitation of nitrosamines visit: https://info.sciex.com/genotoxic-impurities

References

What have we learned from the nitrosamine crisis?, Neil Walsh, March 5, 2020. Are we proactively solving the nitrosamine crisis?, Neil Walsh, May 8, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/138617/download https://www.phenomenex.com/ViewDocument/?id=tn-1259%3A+rapid+analysis+of+genotoxic+nitrosamines+by+hplc-ms_ms https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-arb-recalls-valsartan-losartan

This blog is part 3 of a 3-part series on nitrosamine analysis. Read part 1 (What have we learned from the nitrosamine crisis?), and part 2 (Are we proactively solving the nitrosamine crisis?).

What are the differences between EPA methods 533 and 537.1?

With the risk of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and accumulation in humans and wildlife on the rise, it is important to continuously improve and demonstrate capabilities for accurate and precise low-level quantification in research and...

Rescheduling a Schedule I substance, and the Delta-8 controversy

Did you know that in the US, drugs and other chemicals are classified into 5 distinct categories depending on the drug’s acceptable medical use and its potential for abuse or dependency?  Drugs federally classified as Schedule I substances by the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are considered to have the highest potential for abuse and for creating severe psychological and/or physical dependence. In addition to heroin, LSD and MDMA (ecstasy), cannabis is classified as a Schedule I substance in the Controlled Substance Act of 1970, which means it has no approved medical usage.

The pros and cons of using solid phase extraction and direct injection methods for PFAS testing

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Defense (DoD) methods for testing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water require using solid phase extraction (SPE). SPE has been used extensively in environmental contaminant analysis both for concentrating large sample volumes (improving method sensitivity) and removing matrix interferences (sample cleanup).

Posted by

Neil Walsh is the Senior Manager for Pharma global strategic marketing at SCIEX. In this role, he manages both the strategic market and marketing for the pharmaceutical industry. Neil has spent all his working life entrenched in the pharmaceutical industry from active research, sales and business development through to strategic marketing. Outside of work Neil enjoys rugby, cycling and spending time with his family

0 Comments

Submit a Comment