GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Feb 27, 2019 | Blogs, Food / Beverage | 0 comments
A few months back, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a technical report on the use of chemicals in food processing and the negative health effects on children. One of the main culprits is phthalates.
The 411 of PhthalatesPhthalates are esters of phthalic acid ― refers to 3 isomers: ortho-isomer or phthalic acid, tere phthalic acid, and meta-isomer iso-phthalic acid. These group of chemical compounds are primarily used to make polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or vinyl flexible and pliant to increases flexibility, transparency, and longevity of these products. By weight, they contribute 10-60% of plastic products in our homes, hospitals, cars, and businesses ― detergents, toys, and even in some soaps and shampoos. Talk about an “Everywhere Chemical”!
Phthalates do not chemically bind to the material they are added to, they break down and escape. In other words, water solubility is low and may not biodegrade in the environment. This is particularly concerning when some phthalates have been linked to endocrine disruption, cancer, reproduction and development issues.1,2 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that phthalate exposure is widespread in the U.S. population with measurable levels in the general population.
Depending on molecular weight, phthalates are categorized as:
Phthalates in the Food Chain?That’s right. Unfortunately, studies have found phthalates can migrate into food preparation and packaging. From gloves used in food prep, tubing typically used in milk processing, food-packing films, and even coating from cookware.3,4,5,6
In some cases, the use of these chemicals can be illegal. For instance, in 2011 it reported in Taiwan that bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and Diisononyl phthalate (DINP) were illegally used in clouding agents for use in food and beverages.7
Pretty scary, huh? As if the toxicity of these chemicals isn’t bad enough, the nature of these chemicals complicates detection and quantitation. A food testing lab will need to determine a range of phthalate metabolites in different food matrices with varying acceptable chemical limits. Coupled with chemical background and matrix interferences, it’s difficult to accurately sift through it all and accurately identify these compounds.
Detect Phthalates and Other Food Migrants in Food and Beverage Packages Quickly with LC-MS/MSBeyond shelf appeal, food wrappers, packaging, and preparation utensils like gloves protect food from micro-organisms, biological and chemical contaminants. However, a lesser-known fact, that same material could migrate into the actual food we are trying to protect.
Fret not; our team has developed a technical note to demonstrate the:
For further information, download this free method today by completing the form on the right.
References
Regulated laboratories are evolving faster than ever. New analytical modalities, higher sample throughput, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and leaner teams are reshaping how work gets done. At the same time, expectations for data integrity, standardization, and operational efficiency continue to increase complexity and/or scope. In this environment, LC-MS software is no longer simply an instrument control platform—it has become a critical part of a laboratory’s quality management system. The question is no longer whether your lab has changed, but whether your software has evolved to support the way regulated labs operate today, and if they are ready and able to meet the demands, they will face tomorrow.
Analyst software has long been a trusted foundation in regulated LC-MS laboratories—and for many, it still performs reliably today. But regulated environments are evolving faster than ever. As labs transition to Windows 11, strengthen cybersecurity policies, modernize IT infrastructure, and prepare for future compliance expectations, software decisions are no longer just about what works today—they’re about managing tomorrow’s risk. Analyst will not be supported on Windows 11. While some labs may continue operating in unsupported environments temporarily, the bigger question is: when that risk becomes reality, will your lab be reacting under pressure—or executing a planned mitigation strategy with confidence?
As regulatory scrutiny increases and detection requirements tighten, laboratories are facing a new question: How can TFA be measured reliably, sensitively, and at scale?
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network