John Gibbons

Methods for electrode cleaning for Echo MS systems

Jun 3, 2025 | Blogs, Echo® MS+ system, Pharma | 0 comments

Read Time: 2 min

Depending on the samples that you are running on the system, it is possible for the Echo MS electrode to become dirty or occluded over time. Below are two different cleaning strategies that will be helpful for you to maintain your system and keep your electrodes running well.

Quick cleaning protocol

This protocol is easy to perform between running your sample plates.

From the Maintenance menu of the Echo MS direct control, select OPI Port Access then Lift to provide access to the top of the OPI port.
Disconnect electrode by loosening the finger tight red nut and pulling straight up
Place the OPI port end of the electrode into solvent. With the MS system still active, the draw created from the GS1 flow will draw solvent through the OPI into the MS source, turn Spray voltage to 0.
Wash with Milli-Q water for 1 min
Wash with 20% Acetonitrile with 0.1 M Formic Acid (0.4% FA) for 20 min
- Drawing speed is about 450 µL/min based on the consumption of 20% Acetonitrile with 0.1 M FA
Wash with Milli-Q water for 1 min
Reattach the electrode to the system and tighten the red nut finger tight.
Restart the mobile phase flow and check the Maximum Supported Flow (MSF)

Intensive cleaning protocol

This protocol is an offline protocol that can be used periodically for a more intensive wash of the electrode or to recover electrodes that are suffering from reduced flow rates.

Connect the OPI electrode to a small union (1/16 to 1/32) , IDEX Part # P-881 )

Place the electrode end of the capillary in a waste vessel capable of holding 200 mL or more
Flow at least 200 ml of 50% methanol through the electrode at a flow rate of 5 – 8 mL/min using an HPLC pump
Test on Echo MS system for droplet linearity, reproducibility, and peak shape
If storing the recovered electrode flush with 100% methanol before storing.

Some electrodes may not be able to be recovered but we have had good success with this method.

Why SCIEX partners with experts around the world

Innovation in mass spectrometry does not happen in isolation. Some of the most impactful scientific advances emerge from highly specialized research communities – proteomics experts developing new peptide identification workflows, metabolomics researchers curating spectral databases, toxicologists building compound libraries, and biopharma scientists creating novel characterization methods.

Managing ADC characterization: The challenge of turning complexity into confidence

Unlike traditional monoclonal antibodies, ADCs combine an antibody backbone with linker chemistry and a cytotoxic payload. This multi-component architecture introduces overlapping layers of heterogeneity, including drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) distributions, charge variants, post-translational modifications, and structural changes at both the intact and subunit levels. Across ADC development, these characteristics are considered critical quality attributes that must be characterized, understood, and monitored.

3 reasons ZT Scan DIA is changing the game in metabolomics

For years, metabolomics researchers have faced a frustrating reality: modern high-resolution mass spectrometers can detect tens of thousands of molecular features, yet only a fraction can be confidently identified. The challenge is no longer finding molecules. It is generating the high-quality MS/MS data needed to confidently assign structures and extract meaningful biological insights.

Posted by

John Gibbons

Trained and working in Organic Synthesis I started using mass spectrometry to aid in my synthesis work. As my interest in mass spectrometry grew, I change roles several times within the pharmaceutical industry to be able to focus on its use and applications. I joined SCIEX in 2006, initially as a demo chemist, then with R&D, primarily focused on Analyst, and eventually SCIEX OS software development. More recently I switched to technical product management for Echo MS systems.

0 Comments