What is your Method for Separating Challenging Polar Molecules?

May 22, 2017 | Biopharma, Blogs | 0 comments

From small ions like phosphate, herbicide degradation to metabolites, oligosaccharides, peptides, and proteins. How is your lab analyzing polar molecules? The reason I ask is there is a saying, if you have a charged or polar molecule, look to capillary electrophoresis (CE) first. While liquid chromatography (LC) is an ideal front-end separation tool for many types of molecules, as the following poster points out, “From Small to Very Large, Orthogonal, Sensitive Polar Molecule Analysis by CESI-MS,” there are some situations that call for CE over LC analysis. For those of you that are not familiar with CESI-MS, it is the combining of CE separation with electrospray ionization, into one dynamic process, within the same device. View the Poster >

Complex Polar Molecules
Let me explain. Although effective, analysis by traditional LC-MS methods can present challenges that are addressed by the aqueous nature of capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)-based separations. Therefore, if you have a choice of using LC-MS or CESI-MS when it comes to complex or polar molecules, the latter is ideal for your testing purposes since you can see and get high-resolution separation of PTMs missed by LC-MS methods. Such is the case for large molecules like intact monoclonal antibodies, and for small molecules, CESI can separate geometric isomers and isobaric compounds prior to mass spec analysis. 

Want to see how CESI-MS plays out in the lab? View the Poster and get to know how molecules can be separated to differentiate their subtle structural changes. Collectively you’ll discover how the examples illustrate the simplicity of buffer systems that allow for the analysis of a wide range of highly relevant polar molecules by CESI-MS like phosphonate/phosphate for herbicide analysis to metabolites, oligosaccharides, and intact proteins.

What is more, you will also discover how you can improve the sensitivity, speed, and comprehensiveness of polar biomolecule analysis such as the separation of polar herbicide glyphosate and fungicide fosetyl aluminum. It’s not just polar ions the researchers put to the test either. Read about the results of anionic metabolites, glycans, and intact proteins too. 

Find out how you can save time and resources using CESI-MS technology and read more about CE technology >

 

PFAS testing: 2024 in review and what to expect for 2025

For as long as PFAS persist in the environment, there is no doubt they will persist in our conversations as environmental scientists. Globally, PFAS contamination has been detected in water supplies, soil and even in the blood of people and wildlife. Different countries are at various stages of addressing PFAS contamination and many governments have set regulatory limits and are working on assessing the extent of contamination, cleaning up affected sites and researching safer alternatives.

Inside the box: Acoustic ejection mass spectrometry for drug discovery

On average, it takes 10-15 years and 1-2 billion dollars to approve a new pharmaceutical for clinical use. Since approximately 90% of new drug candidates fail in clinical development, the ability to make early, informed and accurate decisions on the safety and efficacy of new hits and leads is key to increasing the chances of success.

Unveiling the power of ZT Scan DIA: Insights from Ludwig Sinn’s presentation at World HUPO Congress 2024

In a recent presentation at the World HUPO Congress 2024, Ludwig Sinn from the Ralser lab shared exciting advancements in proteomics research, focusing on the innovative ZT Scan DIA acquisition modes developed in collaboration with SCIEX. Let us explore the key highlights and benefits of this innovative technology.

Posted by

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial