Stop Fumbling Around in the Dark: Try LC-MS/MS for Designer Drugs in Forensic Samples

Sep 11, 2018 | Blogs, Forensic | 0 comments

Imagine being blindfolded, sent into a large (dark) room filled with obstacles and challenged to find an item, but you don’t know what that item is, and you have never seen it before. Then you must do the same again the next day, but you are looking for a different item, and it will be in a different place. The phrase fumbling around in the dark comes to mind!

Well, this is what it often feels like for forensic toxicologists trying to keep up with the unpredictable minefield of designer drugs — novel psychoactive substances (NPS).

NPS are synthetic chemicals, whether legal or illegal, closely related to known psychoactive compounds but with slightly altered composition. Not only does this make them difficult to recognize in routine screening, the fact that they are continually evolving – to evade regulation and defy law enforcement efforts — leaves drug screening labs in the dark on what compounds to target.

As if things aren’t tough enough, labs often receive wide varieties of sample types, ranging from blood and urine to hair and oral fluids, with complex biological components and challenging matrices. But it doesn’t stop there, some of these drugs are so potent that users only take a tiny amount, so the drug concentration is very low.

Fumbling around in the dark? Definitely! So, let’s remove the blindfold and shed some light on the matter.

Traditionally drug tests employ a range of targeted methods, and LC-MS/MS is recognized as one of the most efficient and reliable techniques available. The challenge is that these methods can only analyze known substances, limiting drug detection to compounds found on lists of pre-characterized analytes. In other words, if it’s not on the list, it won’t be seen.

How can toxicologists tackle the challenge of never-before-seen drugs? They need a screening tool that can detect trace amounts of unusual components in complex biological samples, even without any prior knowledge of their structural identities. This is the equivalent to removing the blindfold, turning the lights on, putting the obstacles aside and placing the item on a pedestal.

When our researchers here at SCIEX set out to do something, they don’t stop until they get there. As the opioid epidemic becomes the center of the drug overdose crisis, our team sought to develop a non-targeted screening workflow to screen novel fentanyl and its analogs in forensic biological samples.

Fill out the form on the right to download the technical note and learn more.

Telling the PFAS story with pine needles

As an ever-expanding group of chemicals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) require novel techniques to monitor their current and historical presence in the environment. Concerns over exposure to PFAS chemicals continue to grow, with some having known toxic characteristics and the potential effects of others remaining unknown.1 In addition, while PFAS are one of the most persistent synthetic chemicals to date, most of them hardly degrade in the environment.2 So, how long do traces of PFAS last in our environment? Two tools used to help answer this question are active samplers and passive samplers.

Back to the new basics: Part 3 | LC vs. LC-MS and what it means for your lab

In this final installment of our “Back to the new basics” series, we take one more look at analytical techniques and best practices in the lab, and opportunities to improve efficiency. Here, we explore the basic principles of high-performance liquid chromatography (LC) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and how these techniques can affect a lab’s efficiency and productivity.

Meat vs plant based. What is the best option?

As we become more conscious about the planet, healthier lifestyles and our duty to protect the environment, attitudes and behaviours are shifting when it comes to food consumption.

Posted by

0 Comments

Submit a Comment