How Many Concurrent Software Licenses Do You Really Need? Maximize Productivity Without Breaking Your Budget.

Mar 20, 2019 | Blogs, Software, Technology | 0 comments

Does your laboratory have multiple scientists who require access to crucial software at the same time? Are some of those scientists only part-time users?

Purchasing separate licenses for each person can be expensive, especially if some of your users only occasionally need access. So just how many software licenses should you purchase? No one wants to pay for something you don’t need, but you also don’t want to hinder your lab’s productivity by limiting access to critical resources. The concurrent software licensing model can help.

Unlike a node-locked license, where the software program and its license are tied to a specific computer, a concurrent license is obtained from a central server. Much like borrowing a book from a public library, when the user starts the software application on their computer, a license is borrowed from the main server over the network. When the user is finished, they close the application, and the license is returned to the server for someone else to use.

The question becomes: How many, and what type of license should you buy?  If a workstation controls a mass spectrometer, it must use a node-locked license. But if the software is only used for data processing, then a concurrent license might be a more economical choice. So how many concurrent licenses should you purchase? Because concurrent licenses are checked out and not permanently assigned, it becomes a question of how many user-computer combinations need access to the application concurrently, or at the same time, not in total.

This calculation exercise will help you decide:

  1. How many power users do you have? A power user is someone who needs access almost every day, and for many hours per day. This might vary from laboratory to laboratory.

    In this case, we recommend allocating a license to each of your power users.
  2. How many casual users do you have? A casual user is someone who needs access only part-time. Here, the answer is a little trickier:
    • How much time does each casual user need? The optimum number of licenses depends on how many hours per day each casual user needs access.  If one person only needs access for a few hours in the morning, and another person typically requires access in the afternoon, then one concurrent license should suffice.
    • Are all your casual users within the same facility, or are they located around the world? Users within the same time zone can share access to concurrent licenses as long as they can all access the main server. For example, a user in Italy and another in Norway would be able to share a concurrent license because they are in the same time zone. They would need a shared network that allowed access to the main server.

The concurrent licensing model can be quite economical, particularly for laboratories with multiple casual users. Just a few licenses can provide access for many part-time users. But what happens if you need access to the software while traveling? While a node-locked license would certainly suffice, this can be an expensive solution for part-time users. With the concurrent licensing model, users are allowed to borrow a concurrent license to work offline. Upon return, the license is simply checked back in again. To safeguard against a forgotten license that is checked-out for too long, the license “times out” and is checked back in automatically after 7 days.

Hosting concurrent licenses on a central server has many benefits for IT departments too since set-up and deployment is much easier than deploying multiple node-locked licenses. New licenses can be easily added as your user base grows. For ultimate flexibility, concurrent licenses can be purchased one-by-one so the optimal number of licenses can be achieved for each individual laboratory.

To learn more about concurrent software licensing from SCIEX, and how it can be an efficient and economical solution for your laboratory, read our latest white paper. Or, contact our software sales specialist.

3 reasons ZT Scan DIA is changing the game in metabolomics

For years, metabolomics researchers have faced a frustrating reality: modern high-resolution mass spectrometers can detect tens of thousands of molecular features, yet only a fraction can be confidently identified. The challenge is no longer finding molecules. It is generating the high-quality MS/MS data needed to confidently assign structures and extract meaningful biological insights.

ADC analytics FAQs: Answering the most common questions about ADC characterization

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as one of the fastest-growing classes of biotherapeutics, combining the targeting specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic payloads. However, this unique architecture also introduces significant analytical complexity. From drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) distributions and charge variants to conjugation sites and structural modifications, ADCs present multiple, interconnected sources of heterogeneity that must be understood to ensure product quality and performance.

Sterile but toxic: Cereulide detection in food matrices

In a recent webinar, Ming Gao, Ph.D., Senior Research Chemist at Mérieux NutriSciences, explored the growing challenge of cereulide contamination in food products and the analytical strategies needed to detect this heat-stable toxin at trace levels. The session examined how LC-MS/MS can help laboratories overcome the limitations of traditional microbiological screening and meet emerging regulatory requirements.

Posted by


Tags


0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your network