GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Feb 22, 2016 | Blogs, Forensic | 0 comments
In this study, the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (WSLH) outlines the comparison of their existing technology and how SCIEX LC-MS/MS systems can assist them in their forensic research. The WSLH routinely analyze for 300 forensic drug compounds in over 18,000 samples per year.
The highly laborious workflows they used to perform this routine analysis relied upon EMIT, HPLC (with wavelength detection) GC/NPD and GC-MS. The nature of the ever-changing forensic drug testing environment means that it is difficult to identify the widely varying synthetic cannabinoids and novel psychoactive substances.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the adoption of QTOF technology for targeted and unknown forensic drugs screening workflows are sensitive and reliable to achieve these goals. The instrument of choice for this study was the TripleTOF® 5600+ system.
In the video below Adrian Taylor, Forensics Application Manager at SCIEX delivers an overview of the poster presentation for this study which was displayed at the annual TiAFT conference in Firenze, Italy. Download Poster >
Routine forensic drug testing has recently been given a boost with the launch of the X500R QTOF system, this system is designed specifically for routine forensic toxicology analysis. The X500R coupled with the brand new software application, SCIEX OS, delivers an all-encompassing solution for forensic drug screening. The intuitive workflows are ideally suited for the analysis of Synthetic Cannabinoids, Novel Psychoactive Substance. We have also produced a comprehensive library of compounds to assist with your analysis, this library contains over 1700 compounds with full acquired spectral data.
If your lab is using old technology, we want to hear from you. Tell us what kind of experiments you are running and what are the setbacks you have encountered?
Regulated laboratories are evolving faster than ever. New analytical modalities, higher sample throughput, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and leaner teams are reshaping how work gets done. At the same time, expectations for data integrity, standardization, and operational efficiency continue to increase complexity and/or scope. In this environment, LC-MS software is no longer simply an instrument control platform—it has become a critical part of a laboratory’s quality management system. The question is no longer whether your lab has changed, but whether your software has evolved to support the way regulated labs operate today, and if they are ready and able to meet the demands, they will face tomorrow.
Analyst software has long been a trusted foundation in regulated LC-MS laboratories—and for many, it still performs reliably today. But regulated environments are evolving faster than ever. As labs transition to Windows 11, strengthen cybersecurity policies, modernize IT infrastructure, and prepare for future compliance expectations, software decisions are no longer just about what works today—they’re about managing tomorrow’s risk. Analyst will not be supported on Windows 11. While some labs may continue operating in unsupported environments temporarily, the bigger question is: when that risk becomes reality, will your lab be reacting under pressure—or executing a planned mitigation strategy with confidence?
As regulatory scrutiny increases and detection requirements tighten, laboratories are facing a new question: How can TFA be measured reliably, sensitively, and at scale?
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network