GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
May 31, 2018 | Blogs, Technology | 0 comments
Traditional mass spectrometry ionization methods such as electronic spray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), are popular methods for detecting the molecular weight of proteins, peptides, and other biologics. The reason being both methods allow for measurement of large molecular weight1 while their sensitivity leads to accurate quantitative and qualitative results.
Two Principal Disadvantages of These MethodsHowever, let’s say you are in the lab running thousands of samples. Both ESI and MALDI require advanced sample prep via capillary electrophoresis (CE) or liquid chromatography (LC) analysis. Additionally, the apparatus itself is difficult to clean due to previous contamination from various residues2. These factors are probably two of the prime disadvantages of these methods.
The SolutionWhat if there was a way you could control the formation of ions only when data collection is required? That is the topic of this tech note, Increasing System Robustness with Ion Formation Control. Researchers in the study significantly extended their system operation before instrument cleaning was required, thus, saving time.
The Key to Scheduled Ionization Success Is in the SoftwareA version of Analyst® software 1.7 was used for acquisition. This version turns off the ionization voltage when no data collection is required. The ionization voltage is also turned off once data collection is complete and remains off until the LC method is completed, and turned off between samples. This mode of operation, where the ionization voltage is turned on for data collection only, is referred to as Scheduled Ionization. Using this approach, all conventional acquisition workflows (MRM, Scheduled MRM™ algorithm, IDA, SWATH® Acquisition) can be supported with a common user interface.
The Take-AwayControlling the ion formation can effectively reduce contamination of ion optics under analytical conditions. By scheduling the formation of ions, it is possible to extend the use of the instrument over prolonged duration due to the reduction of contamination of the front end.
Also, these benefits are like using a divert valve, but without the complexity of additional hardware. As MS instruments move into more routine and automated environments, fewer operator interventions are needed.
Download the tech note to learn more about how the Scheduled Ionization feature can offer you at least 2X longer sustained instrument operation before required cleaning.
Ready to improve your lab’s productivity with Analyst Software 1.7? Find out more about how to upgrade >Download Tech Note >
References1. http://chemistry.emory.edu/msc/tutorial/mass-spectrometry-ionization.html2. https://chem.libretexts.org/Core/Analytical_Chemistry/Instrumental_Analysis/Mass_Spectrometry/mass_Spectrometers_(Instrumentation)/Electrospray_Ionization_Mass_Spectrometry
Regulated laboratories are evolving faster than ever. New analytical modalities, higher sample throughput, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and leaner teams are reshaping how work gets done. At the same time, expectations for data integrity, standardization, and operational efficiency continue to increase complexity and/or scope. In this environment, LC-MS software is no longer simply an instrument control platform—it has become a critical part of a laboratory’s quality management system. The question is no longer whether your lab has changed, but whether your software has evolved to support the way regulated labs operate today, and if they are ready and able to meet the demands, they will face tomorrow.
Analyst software has long been a trusted foundation in regulated LC-MS laboratories—and for many, it still performs reliably today. But regulated environments are evolving faster than ever. As labs transition to Windows 11, strengthen cybersecurity policies, modernize IT infrastructure, and prepare for future compliance expectations, software decisions are no longer just about what works today—they’re about managing tomorrow’s risk. Analyst will not be supported on Windows 11. While some labs may continue operating in unsupported environments temporarily, the bigger question is: when that risk becomes reality, will your lab be reacting under pressure—or executing a planned mitigation strategy with confidence?
As regulatory scrutiny increases and detection requirements tighten, laboratories are facing a new question: How can TFA be measured reliably, sensitively, and at scale?
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network