GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Jun 27, 2019 | Blogs, Technology | 0 comments
Choosing the best technique for your analysis can be tough. Should you go with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)? That’s the key question. That’s why we’re here to help.
The Limitations of GC-MSGC-MS is an established technique to analyze volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and trihalomethanes (THMs). Simply put, it’s a technique that’s best used for thermally stable molecules. Traditionally, GC-MS is the preferred technique for the analysis of less polar and more volatile compounds such as organochlorine pesticides, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyl.
While the technique can offer good separation, the high temperatures used for vaporization during GC analysis can alter or degrade half of the analytes in a sample1. This is the primary concern for life science researchers who deal with relatively labile biological molecules that break down easily at high temperatures. GC-MS also becomes a challenge because it can involve labor-intensive sample preparation and long chromatographic run times.
The LC-MS/MS AdvantageLC-MS/MS combines the separation power of liquid chromatography with the identification and quantification power of tandem mass spectrometry.
The strength of this technique is in the ability of LC to separate a wide range of compounds before the tandem MS quantifies them with a high degree of sensitivity and selectivity based on the unique mass/charge (m/z) transitions of each compound of interest.
LC-MS/MS systems offer these basic benefits:
Many scientists who need increased levels of sensitivity, reproducibility, and robustness over GC-MS are either considering or have already made the leap to LC-MS/MS. When will you?
Let SCIEX Help You Make the Leap from GC-MS to LC-MS/MS
If your budget is holding you back, we have news for you. The SCIEX Triple Quad™ 3500 System provides all the advantages of modern LC-MS/MS technology. It’s the ideal choice for labs operating on a tight budget, and its simplicity of operation has the potential to expand your operation beyond the restrictions of gas chromatography.
Simply put, the Triple Quad 3500 LC-MS/MS System explained in fewer than 140 characters: Legendary power, speed, and accuracy are more affordable than ever.
Download your copy of the compendium to see what the SCIEX Triple Quad 3500 LC-MS/MS system can do for your laboratory.
Reference:
As an analytical strategy, middle-down mass spectrometry (MS) workflows characterize biotherapeutic proteins by analyzing large, digested protein fragments or defined subunits, rather than fully intact proteins (top-down) or digested peptides (bottom-up). A middle-down strategy combines the strengths of top-down and bottom-up approaches by delivering high sequence coverage and structural specificity while maintaining relatively simple sample preparation. In practice, middle-down analysis enables accurate mass measurement, rapid sequence confirmation, and localization of key post-translational modifications (PTMs) on protein subunits that are directly relevant to product quality.
In biopharmaceutical development, sequence variants (SV) are considered an inherent risk of producing complex proteins in living systems. Sequence variants are unintended changes to the amino acid sequence of a biotherapeutic and can be caused by errors in transcription or translation in the host cell, or cell culture and process conditions. Detailed analysis of SVs is important in process and product development to ensure the drug’s safety and efficacy. Even low‑level sequence variants can have significant implications for product quality, safety, and efficacy, making their accurate detection and characterization a critical requirement across development, process optimization, and regulatory submission.
CE‑SDS remains a cornerstone assay for characterizing fragmentation, aggregation, and product‑related impurities in therapeutic proteins. UV detection has been the long‑standing standard. However, it frequently struggles with baseline noise, limited sensitivity for minor fragments, and subjective integration.
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network