Worth the Journey – From Immunoassay to LC-MS/MS Adoption

Oct 8, 2019 | Blogs, Clinical | 0 comments

The journey to mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) adoption from immunoassay can be complicated, but certainly rewarding. While immunoassay has been considered the default methodology for decades, they can be susceptible to interferences and cross-reactivity, especially for biological compounds that exhibit similar chemical structures. Moreover, comparisons between manufacturers can give rise to differences in results when testing for the same analyte due to variations in antibody production, causing unwanted bias during evaluation of an assay.

An increasing number of clinical laboratories around the world have begun to consider and begin the journey of developing their own methodology based on mass spectrometry. There are a number of advantages with the LC-MS/MS approach: high-performance separation, identification, and quantification of small molecules, peptides, and proteins routinely tested in a biochemistry laboratory. The ability to quickly adapt to new and emerging trends in laboratory testing, as well as the freedom to troubleshoot their own methods are a huge advantage.

Besides excellent reproducibility and specificity, LC-MS/MS has the capacity for multiplexing, high-throughput, and provides significant cost savings as users implement their own Lab Developed Tests. These features are some of the reasons for the increasing popularity of mass spectrometry adoption, even in the face of the need for specialized and specifically-trained technicians and its own set of analytical challenges.

Mass spectrometry is becoming the gold standard for quantification. The cost savings for LC-MS/MS alone may not be enough, but when coupled with the three “Ss”: Speed, Sensitivity, and Selectivity, the potentials become much clearer. The journey has helped improve the practice of medicine and enabled physicians to provide better patient care and even allowed for the development of precision diagnostics. 

With the ever-present challenges associated with laboratory test reimbursement, mass spectrometry can provide a solution that saves money and provides multiple benefits to the patient and the healthcare system.

Dr. Caroline Le Goff, a Clinical Biochemist from the University of Liège recently participated in a webinar with us, detailing her experience in the journey from immunoassay to mass spectrometry adoption.

Come and discover her experiences throughout the journey.

Lab Developed Tests for the clinical laboratory >

 

PFAS FAQ’s: Ask our experts

As PFAS testing continues to expand, laboratories face increasing pressure to deliver reliable results at lower detection limits and faster turnaround times. While much of the conversation focuses on analytical methods and regulations, maintaining instrument performance and minimizing downtime are equally critical to success.

How LC-MS laboratories in regulated environments can build a strong foundation for reliable data, audit readiness and lifecycle control

Whether supporting pharmaceutical quality control, bioanalysis, clinical research, environmental testing, or food safety applications, regulated laboratories share a common responsibility: ensuring reliable data, maintaining audit readiness, and controlling systems throughout their lifecycle. Yet when compliance discussions arise, attention often moves quickly to audits, documentation, electronic records, and standard operating procedures. These elements are essential, but they depend on a more fundamental question: Can the analytical system consistently produce reliable results?

Future-proofing pesticide testing: Why speed is becoming a competitive advantage

Food testing laboratories face growing pressure. Pesticide panels continue to expand, regulations evolve, and customers still expect fast turnaround times at a competitive cost.

Posted by

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your network