Identifying the unknown PFAS profile in firefighting foams/AFFF

Sep 17, 2021 | Blogs, Environmental / Industrial | 0 comments

Read time: 2 minutes

According to a recent study from Harvard University, the US EPA, and NIEHS, traditional targeted analysis techniques poorly characterize the PFAS composition of contemporary PFAS-based firefighting foams, know as aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF).  Using the EPA 533 PFAS drinking water method for the analyte list, the researchers found that targeted mass spectrometry methods accounted for <1% of organic fluorine content.  This is important because it demonstrates that targeted analysis methods miss nearly all the PFAS compounds in modern AFFF mixtures, thus underestimating the risk to human health and the environment.

In the second episode of PFAS Fireside chats, the lead author, Bridger Ruyle, joined me to discuss the study’s main findings and implications.  Bridger is a PhD student in Environmental Science and Engineering at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science.        

The study examined both legacy and modern commercial AFFF mixtures.  AFFF are used to combat petroleum-based fires by creating a barrier between the fire and air, and they are they used extensively at airports and by the military around the globe. 

If targeted analytical methods don’t adequately capture all the PFAS compounds in a sample, how did the researchers know what they were missing?  First, the researchers used techniques such as “extractable organofluorine (EOF)” to quantify the total potential PFAS compounds in the AFFF mixtures.  That is how they showed their targeted methods were missing a substantial portion of the PFAS.  Next, they used high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry to identify the unknown PFAS. 

So, what’s in these modern AFFF mixtures?  It turns out that >90% of the PFAS compounds are 6:2 fluorotelomer-based compounds.  While the exact fate of these isn’t well understood, they could potentially degrade to very persistent PFAS compounds, several of which are covered by various state and federal regulations.

The study focused on commercial AFFF mixtures, but what does it look like in the real-world environment where AFFF releases have impacted the surface and groundwater?  Bridger and his colleagues addressed that question in a follow-up paper, and perhaps we will talk about it in a future episode of PFAS Fireside chats.

RUO-MKT-18-13829-A

Telling the PFAS story with pine needles

As an ever-expanding group of chemicals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) require novel techniques to monitor their current and historical presence in the environment. Concerns over exposure to PFAS chemicals continue to grow, with some having known toxic characteristics and the potential effects of others remaining unknown.1 In addition, while PFAS are one of the most persistent synthetic chemicals to date, most of them hardly degrade in the environment.2 So, how long do traces of PFAS last in our environment? Two tools used to help answer this question are active samplers and passive samplers.

Back to the new basics: Part 3 | LC vs. LC-MS and what it means for your lab

In this final installment of our “Back to the new basics” series, we take one more look at analytical techniques and best practices in the lab, and opportunities to improve efficiency. Here, we explore the basic principles of high-performance liquid chromatography (LC) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and how these techniques can affect a lab’s efficiency and productivity.

Meat vs plant based. What is the best option?

As we become more conscious about the planet, healthier lifestyles and our duty to protect the environment, attitudes and behaviours are shifting when it comes to food consumption.

Posted by

Craig has worked in the mass spectrometry industry for over 20 years and has been with SCIEX since 2016. As a senior product application specialist, he works with customers to understand their targeted screening workflows and provide solutions using high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry technologies.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment