GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Aug 23, 2019 | Blogs, Environmental / Industrial, Food / Beverage | 0 comments
The BasicsIn today’s busy analytical laboratories, productivity and high sample throughput are constant demands. More samples need to be analyzed in a shorter timeframe. Laboratories must work to use equipment at its maximum capacity, and methods must be optimized.
With liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), the chromatography separation has the capacity to resolve a certain number of compounds in a specified period of time. Generally, the shorter the LC run time, the poorer the chromatographic resolution. This potentially affects the MS data quality for those analytes. This is true even for high capacity LC columns, such as those for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC).
With an MS detector—let’s say a triple quadrupole MS—you can overcome some of the chromatography shortfalls by using a highly-specific data acquisition method such as Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM). This is also known as Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) when more than one reaction is involved. The approach allows compounds to be identified and tracked by a specific precursor to product ion transition, or MRM. As the term “multiple” suggests, you can run concurrent compound transitions in virtually the same time frame (within a few milliseconds). Because each transition is unique to a compound, MRM is a highly specific, sensitive, and efficient way of quantifying an analyte.
With a SCIEX triple quadrupole, the unique features of the acquisition software allow the method to be finely optimized to achieve the right number of data points for accurate and precise quantification of chromatographic peaks. This is a feature called Scheduled MRM™ Pro algorithm. It provides a very efficient way of analyzing 100s of analytes within the necessary duty cycle.
The Polarity QuestionWhat if you need a single LC-MS/MS method to analyze compounds with positive and negative ionization states simultaneously? And what if you need to look at both ionization modes while maintaining a high duty cycle, high selectivity, high sensitivity, and chromatographic peak shape integrity?
Well, MS instruments such as the mid-range SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500+ LC-MS/MS System – QTRAP® Ready or high-end SCIEX Triple Quad™ 6500+ LC-MS/MS System. Both these instruments have detector technology that allows a single method with positive/negative ion switching to run without compromising your data quality.
In the past, MRM conditions were optimized by choosing dwell times that wouldn’t affect the duty cycle of the experiment—which reduced sensitivity and affected detection levels. This generally meant, shorter dwell times for a particular MRM would result in lower accuracy in peak detection and a much higher detection limit.
With the new data acquisition architecture, excellent software algorithms, and powerful electronics, both the SCIEX 5500+ and 6500+ systems can reduce the polarity switching time from 50 milliseconds to 5 milliseconds while maintaining performance characteristics. This ultimately gives an analytical chemist the ability to analyze more compounds in the same amount of time!
See it in action with these workflows:
SCIEX 5500+ System
SCIEX 6500+ System
Ultra‑low reporting limits, expanding target lists, and the constant risk of background contamination mean that even small missteps before injection can compromise data integrity. PFAS can be introduced at nearly every stage of prep, from sampling containers and PPE to SPE cartridges, filters, solvents, and lab consumables, making contamination control as critical as analyte recovery.
In monoclonal antibody (mAb) development, assessment of purity and integrity of the protein in question is critical. CE‑SDS is the gold standard assay and is routinely run from analytical development through QC and lot release. It’s trusted because it consistently delivers quantitative, size‑based insight into purity and fragmentation, and it fits naturally into regulated environments.
In drug discovery and development, Metabolite Identification (Met ID) plays a critical role in understanding biotransformation pathways, ensuring safety, and meeting regulatory requirements. Advanced mass spectrometry techniques have revolutionized this process, particularly through electron-based fragmentation methods such as Electron Activated Dissociation (EAD) and Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD). While both techniques leverage electron interactions to generate informative fragment ions, they differ significantly in mechanism, performance, and suitability for Met ID workflows.
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network