GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
Aug 23, 2019 | Blogs, Environmental / Industrial, Food / Beverage | 0 comments
The BasicsIn today’s busy analytical laboratories, productivity and high sample throughput are constant demands. More samples need to be analyzed in a shorter timeframe. Laboratories must work to use equipment at its maximum capacity, and methods must be optimized.
With liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), the chromatography separation has the capacity to resolve a certain number of compounds in a specified period of time. Generally, the shorter the LC run time, the poorer the chromatographic resolution. This potentially affects the MS data quality for those analytes. This is true even for high capacity LC columns, such as those for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC).
With an MS detector—let’s say a triple quadrupole MS—you can overcome some of the chromatography shortfalls by using a highly-specific data acquisition method such as Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM). This is also known as Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) when more than one reaction is involved. The approach allows compounds to be identified and tracked by a specific precursor to product ion transition, or MRM. As the term “multiple” suggests, you can run concurrent compound transitions in virtually the same time frame (within a few milliseconds). Because each transition is unique to a compound, MRM is a highly specific, sensitive, and efficient way of quantifying an analyte.
With a SCIEX triple quadrupole, the unique features of the acquisition software allow the method to be finely optimized to achieve the right number of data points for accurate and precise quantification of chromatographic peaks. This is a feature called Scheduled MRM™ Pro algorithm. It provides a very efficient way of analyzing 100s of analytes within the necessary duty cycle.
The Polarity QuestionWhat if you need a single LC-MS/MS method to analyze compounds with positive and negative ionization states simultaneously? And what if you need to look at both ionization modes while maintaining a high duty cycle, high selectivity, high sensitivity, and chromatographic peak shape integrity?
Well, MS instruments such as the mid-range SCIEX 5500+ system, SCIEX 6500+ system or high-end SCIEX 7500+ system. These instruments have detector technology that allows a single method with positive/negative ion switching to run without compromising your data quality.
In the past, MRM conditions were optimized by choosing dwell times that wouldn’t affect the duty cycle of the experiment—which reduced sensitivity and affected detection levels. This generally meant, shorter dwell times for a particular MRM would result in lower accuracy in peak detection and a much higher detection limit.
With the new data acquisition architecture, excellent software algorithms, and powerful electronics, the SCIEX 5500+ and 6500+ and 7500+ systems can reduce the polarity switching time from 50 milliseconds to 5 milliseconds while maintaining performance characteristics. This ultimately gives an analytical chemist the ability to analyze more compounds in the same amount of time!
See it in action with these workflows:
SCIEX 5500+ System
SCIEX 6500+ System
Regulated laboratories are evolving faster than ever. New analytical modalities, higher sample throughput, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and leaner teams are reshaping how work gets done. At the same time, expectations for data integrity, standardization, and operational efficiency continue to increase complexity and/or scope. In this environment, LC-MS software is no longer simply an instrument control platform—it has become a critical part of a laboratory’s quality management system. The question is no longer whether your lab has changed, but whether your software has evolved to support the way regulated labs operate today, and if they are ready and able to meet the demands, they will face tomorrow.
Analyst software has long been a trusted foundation in regulated LC-MS laboratories—and for many, it still performs reliably today. But regulated environments are evolving faster than ever. As labs transition to Windows 11, strengthen cybersecurity policies, modernize IT infrastructure, and prepare for future compliance expectations, software decisions are no longer just about what works today—they’re about managing tomorrow’s risk. Analyst will not be supported on Windows 11. While some labs may continue operating in unsupported environments temporarily, the bigger question is: when that risk becomes reality, will your lab be reacting under pressure—or executing a planned mitigation strategy with confidence?
As regulatory scrutiny increases and detection requirements tighten, laboratories are facing a new question: How can TFA be measured reliably, sensitively, and at scale?
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network