GEN-MKT-18-7897-A
May 3, 2019 | Blogs, Life Science Research, Proteomics | 0 comments
Although humans have been able to influence the traits of plants and animals for thousands of years through domestication and selective breeding, it wasn’t until the early 1970s and the development of genetic engineering techniques that man could directly manipulate the genetic outcome of another organism.1 These early genetic engineering experiments sparked a revolution of discovery and innovation that has led to the development of cutting-edge biotechnology, synthetic biology, and genome editing techniques.
Today, modern gene editing techniques allow the insertion, deletion, alteration, or replacement of DNA at precise locations within the genome.2 Because of its ease-of-use and versatility, the CRISPR-Cas9 system3 (which stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR associated protein 9) is now the most widely used of these techniques and has been embraced around the world for many applications.4 For example, in food production, researchers are using CRISPR-Cas9 to manipulate plant genomes to increase crop yield, consume less water, intensify flavor, and improve disease resistance. 4 In livestock research, scientists are developing heat-resistant cows that can thrive in warmer climates to help deal with global warming. 4 In medical diagnostics, the CRISPR system is being used as the basis of a consumer kit that could be used at home for early detection of cancer and infectious diseases. 4 To eradicate malaria, researchers are manipulating the genome of the host mosquito to be resistant to the malaria parasite. 4 And of course, it has found wide-ranging uses in biomedical research to understand gene function in cell cultures and model organisms such as a mouse. CRISPR-Cas9 is being investigated for gene therapy to replace a mutated gene with a functional therapeutic gene.
So how does it work? CRISPR-Cas9 consists of two components, a guide RNA that is specific to the target DNA sequence, and an endonuclease protein, in this case, Cas9, that acts as molecular scissors to cut double-stranded DNA. After cutting, the cell naturally repairs the cut. This process can be hijacked to remove whole sections of DNA or add new or modified portions of DNA as the repair piece. After the gene is edited, assays are typically performed for DNA-level and RNA-level verification. However, sometimes these assays can be inconclusive. For example, when attempting to knockout a gene, often nature will splice around the knockout point in an attempt to create some version of the gene. These mRNA levels may not correlate well with what’s actually happening at the protein level. Because the entire reason for gene editing is often to study or cause some change within an organism’s protein expression or observable traits, protein-level verification becomes very important.
The most common assays for protein-level verification involve immunoblotting techniques such as western blot and ELISA. These techniques require antibodies. However, often antibodies aren’t available, are low quality, are too costly to produce, or there is a large time lag for their production.
Alternatively, proteomics using mass spectrometry is universally applicable without the need for antibodies. In particular, SWATH Acquisition using a TripleTOF® system can provide comprehensive protein-level quantitation across the entire proteome. This means that not only can the affected gene product of the gene editing event be verified, but also corresponding changes throughout the entire proteome can be quantified. Additionally, SWATH Acquisition is highly sensitive and reproducible, capable of consistently detecting and quantifying thousands of proteins from cell lines across multiple instruments, operators, and laboratories.5
Recently researchers in Singapore used SWATH Acquisition for protein-level verification after CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing of the Major Vault Protein (MVP) in zebrafish.6 Initial verification studies using mRNA assays were inconclusive showing truncated forms of the gene still being transcribed in the mutant lines. No zebrafish antibodies were available for protein-level verification. Using SWATH Acquisition, the researchers were not only able to confirm complete knock-out of the gene, but also quantify concomitant proteome responses. In total, about 3800 proteins were detected and quantified from each sample in a single run, and of those, a number of proteins were significantly up- or down-regulated. While MVP proteins have no known function, the proteins that were significantly changed belonged to several different groups of related processes helping researchers further unravel the mysteries of this protein.
Advantages of MS Analysis for protein level confirmation after CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing:
SWATH Acquisition is ideally suited for verification at the protein level of any gene editing event. Additionally, SWATH Acquisition provides comprehensive information regarding farther reaching biological implications of the experiment. For more information about SWATH Acquisition including videos, testimonials, and application notes, please visit our SWATH technology web site.
References
For more than 20 years, the CDCO has supported academic, commercial, and not‑for‑profit drug discovery programs with deep expertise in pharmaceutical lead optimization. Within the bioanalytical group, their role is to enable rapid and reliable decision‑making through quantitative analysis of candidate drugs in biological matrices.
PFAS are increasingly at the center of regulatory change, scientific research, and industry discussion worldwide. As analytical capabilities improve and expectations around environmental responsibility continue to evolve, understanding the role PFAS play, and how they are being addressed, has never been more important. This blog provides an overview of what PFAS are, why they matter, and how responses from regulators and industry are changing.
Pesticides are widely used in agriculture to protect crops and maintain yield, but their presence in food must be carefully monitored. To safeguard consumers, regulatory authorities worldwide set maximum residue limits (MRLs), often at very low concentrations and across a wide range of compound classes.
Posted by
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Share this post with your network